rediff.com Home > Money > Budget 2001 > CRISIL Budget Impact Analysis Banner Ads
Channels: Astrology | Broadband | Contests | E-cards | Money | Movies | Romance | Search | Weather | Wedding | Women
Partner Channels: Auctions | Auto | Bill Pay | Jobs | Lifestyle | Technology | Travel
March 1, 2001                                       Feedback  

    - BUDGET RUN-UP
    - BUDGET SPEECH '00
    - COLUMNISTS
    - INTERVIEWS
    - CREDIT POLICY
    - ECONOMIC SURVEY
    - GOVT & ECONOMY
    - RAILWAY BUDGET
    - EXIM POLICY '00


    
      


    - BUDGET PROCESS

    - BUDGET 00-01
    - BUDGET 99-00
    - BUDGET 98-99
    - BUDGET 97-98

    - NEWSLINKS


Information you can use

   The Best Budget Sites
   Ministry of Finance
   Budget 2000
   Reserve Bank of India


 




Banner Ads
Banner Ads
Banner Ads
Banner Ads
 Search the Internet
         Tips
 Sites: Finance, Investment
E-Mail this report to a friend
Print this page

Sector Focus: Basic Petrochemicals And Polymers

Basic petrochemicals and Polymers: State of the industry (2000-01)

Petrochemicals: Tariffs, prices and landed costs
 

Tariffs (per cent)

Prices (Jan 2001)

Landed costs (Rs/ton)

 

Customs

Excise

Domestic

 

Intnl.

 

Pre-budget

Post budget

 

00-01

01-02

00-01

01-02

(Rs/tonne)

 

($/ton)

     

hdPE (IM)

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

47,908

1

618

 

49,073

47,833

ldPE

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

49,200

1

700

 

55,629

54,224

lldPE

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

49,300

1

633

 

50,265

48,995

PPHP (IM)

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

43,268

1

575

 

45,696

44,541

PVC

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

45,124

1

588

 

46,689

45,509

PS (GP)

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

61,480

1

715

 

56,822

55,386

ABS

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

73,000

 

956

 

65,515

63,860

SBR (1502)

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

54,000

 

950

 

65,084

63,439

PBR (1220)

44.0

40.4

16.0

16.0

63,220

 

900

 

61,658

60,100

EDC

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

22,625

1

190

2

16,712

16,497

VCM

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

n.a.

 

400

2

30,750

30,354

Styrene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

50,250

1

622

 

45,570

44,983

Ethylene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

31,500

 

443

2

28,427

28,061

Propylene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

36,000

 

410

2

26,508

26,167

Butadiene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

35,000

 

517

2

32,657

32,237

Benzene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

23,000

 

371

2

24,843

24,523

Toluene

21.2

19.6

16.0

16.0

20,700

 

303

2

20,331

20,069

Naphtha

5.0

5.0

16.0

16.0

10,860

 

259

 

12,945

12,945


ABS: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; EDC: Ethylene dichloride; hdPE: High density polyethylene; IM: Injection moulding; ldPE: Low density polyethylene; lldPE: Linear low density polyethylene; PBR: Polybutadiene rubber; PPHP: Polypropylene homopolymer; PS (GP): Polystyrene (general purpose); SBR: Styrene butadiene rubber; VCM: Vinyl chloride monomer.
n.a.: Not available
1 Market prices; 2 Fob prices
Note
Anti-dumping duties on PS and SBR have not been included in the landed cost, as they vary by country.
Source: CRIS INFACŪ

  • In 2000-01, demand for various commodity polymers is expected to increase by 3-17 per cent. However, growth in demand could be affected by the high prices of polymers.
  • In 2000-01, supply of hdPE, lldPE and PP increased due to the commissioning of Haldia Petrochemicals' cracker and downstream units. Imports declined, while exports increased, due to an increase in domestic availability.
  • Prices of polymers increased in first half of 2000-01, in line with the increase in the prices of feedstocks, naphtha, ethylene and propylene. However, in second half of 2000-01, prices of naphtha, ethylene and propylene declined due to increased production of crude oil by OPEC and the release of petroleum products by the US from its Strategic Petroleum Reserves. Hence, prices of polymers declined.
  • In 2000-01, margins of most polymer producers are expected to be lower as compared with those in 1999-2000, as the increase in the prices of feedstocks, is expected to be higher as compared with the increase in polymer prices.

Basic petrochemicals and Polymers: Budget impact

Impact factors

Company name

Impact

Impact factors

DCW

Neg

A,B,C

(6.75, 6.90)

   

Finolex Industries

Neut

A,B

(22.45, 22.95)

   

IPCL

Neg

A,B,D

(69.00, 71.35)

   

NOCIL

Neg

A,B,D

(18.40, 17.95)

   

RIL

Neg

A,B,E

(402.75, 414.10)

   

Note

Figures in brackets indicate the closing share prices, on February 27, 2001 and February 28, 2001, respectively.

Pos= positive Neg= negative Neut= neutral

Source: CRIS INFACŪ

A: The reduction in the effective customs duty on basic petrochemicals and polymers is expected to have a negative impact, especially on the integrated petrochemical producers. Domestic polymer (and basic petrochemical) prices are expected to decline in line with a decline in the landed costs. However, impact on non-integrated players, such as Finolex Industries, Supreme Petrochemicals Limited and DCW Limited will be marginal due to a reduction in feedstock costs.

B: The reduction of surcharge on corporate tax, from 13 per cent to 2 per cent and the expected decline in interest rates, is expected to have a positive impact on producers.

C: The reduction in the effective customs duty on soda ash, from 44.04 per cent to 24.8 per cent, and caustic soda, from 44.04 per cent to 40.4 per cent is expected to have a negative impact on the margins of DCW Limited.

D: The reduction in the effective customs duty on MEG, from 32.6 per cent to 24.8 per cent is likely to have a negative impact on the margins of IPCL and NOCIL.

E: The reduction in the effective customs duty on fibre intermediates, MEG and PTA, from 32.6 per cent to 24.8 per cent, and PX, from 9.7 per cent to 9.2 per cent, is expected to have a negative impact on the margins of Reliance Industries Limited.

Rediff-CRISIL Budget Impact Analysis
Budget 2001


Disclaimer: CRISIL has taken due care and caution in compiling this report. Information has been obtained by CRISIL from sources which it considers reliable. However, CRISIL does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. CRISIL is also not responsible for any errors in transmission and especially states that it has no financial liability whatsoever to the subscribers/ users/ transmitters/ distributors of its web site.

Tell us what you think of this analysis